Skip Navigation
Honoring Patricia Friedel Steele Read More Here

Adam Bloomberg

Shareholder/Managing Director – Visual Communications

Overview

With more than 26 years of experience, Adam has consulted with hundreds of trial teams and corporate clients to develop communication strategies and presentations that educate, inform, and persuade. He creates materials and exhibits for mock trials, focus groups, arbitrations, and trials.

Adam has led trial and war-room technology and logistics efforts for a plethora of cases, such as toxic tort, product liability, financial, employment, transportation, and commercial cases. Adam has “hot seated” over 1,000 trials, hearings, focus groups, and mock trials.

Over the years, he has published articles on trial technology in various professional periodicals including the National Law Journal.

Education

  • B.S., Communications, Texas Christian University

Notable Experience

  • Garcia and Magana v. J&R Schugel, et al. All-virtual jury Zoom trial (Bexar County, TX)
  • Roemmich v. 3M, October 2020. Month-long hybrid virtual trial (Seattle, WA)
  • Stryker v. XL Insurance. First Federal trial during COVID (U.S. District Court, Kalamazoo, MI)
  • Wells Fargo v. DOJ (U.S. District Court, Minneapolis, MN)
  • GM ignition Switch Litigation (Focus Groups/Mock trials in NYC)
  • Stanley, et al. v. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (State Court, Dallas, TX)
  • Greyhound Bus Litigation (numerous mock trials and trials across Texas)
  • FTC v. St. Luke’s Health System (U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho)
  • Valspar Corp., et al. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware)
  • Administrada v Dupont (U.S. District Court for the District of Florida)
  • Johnson v. General Mills Inc. (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California)
  • In RE: PPA – MDL Science Hearings (U.S. District Court, Western District, WA)
  • Sparich v. GSK (State Court, Philadelphia, PA)
  • State of Texas v. Big Tobacco (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of TX)
  • Conwood Company v. U.S. Tobacco (U.S. District Court, Western District, KY);
    largest anti-trust settlement ever collected
  • Neuheisel v. University of Washington & NCAA (State Court, Seattle, WA)
  • 3M Silica Litigation (numerous focus groups and mock trials across the country)
  • American Optical Silica Litigation (numerous focus groups and mock trials across the country)
  • Kaiser Silica Litigation (numerous trials across the country)
  • Parker Products Silica Litigation (numerous trials across the country)
  • Welding Rod Litigation (Focus Groups/Mock trials in NYC)
  • Microsoft v. Federal Ins. (U.S. District Court, Western District of WA)
  • Pacific Enterprises v. Federal Ins. (U.S. District Court, Central District of CA)
  • Intergraph v. Toshiba (U.S. District Court, Northern District of CA)

Selected Articles & Presentations

Videos

Meet Adam Bloomberg of Litigation Insights

Litigation Insights’ Design Process

Storytelling in the Age of Emojis

New Media’s Impact on Jurors
(and How Your Trial Graphics Should Respond)

How to Rehearse Your Closing Argument –
Without Stumbling Over Your Slides

What Trial Graphics Belong in My Closing Arguments?

The 7 Keys To Effective Litigation Timelines

The Key to Finding the Best Courtroom
Technology Consultant Every Time

Trial Technology: What Has & Hasn’t Changed
in Nearly Two Decades

How to Turn Financial Data into Trial Graphics
to Tell a Story

What’s the Best Presentation Software
for Presenting Documents at Trial?

How to Make Video Depositions More Engaging
For Jurors

Defending Personal Injury Cases with
Engaging Graphics

8 Tips For Preparing On-Site Trial Support Budgets

Does Court-Provided Audiovisual Equipment
Help or Hinder?

Trial Graphics: Top Six Ways to Get More
Out of a Limited Budget